Those in Michigan (and nationwide) who object to Michigan’s official policy, written into law last week, that abortions are not a covered service required to be provided by insurance companies, have taken on a new tactic to express their anger.
Coverage for abortions now requires a separate rider in Michigan, sometimes from a different insurance company or sometimes paid for by the individual if her employer has a moral conflict with covering her abortions.
Opponents are calling these riders “rape insurance.”
Ah, yes, use hyperbole to bring up the extremely small percentage of abortions that are requested due to rape. Then drag that language front and center!
They say the people who control the language also control the dialogue. This is not a time for conservatives to passively sit back and let the language be hijacked this way.
When I was younger, insurance companies often had separate riders for maternity insurance. We didn’t purchase one, even when trying for a brother or sister for Joey (he was born at the local naval hospital and cost us a sum total of $16). We had intended to have our second child, and any subsequent children, born at home and to pay the midwife out of pocket.
Quaint concept that–paying out of pocket for the things we want. We now think everything our heart desires must be covered by someone else’s funding, don’t we?
Thus we have an outcry when those who desire an abortion can’t find a way to get them free (read: at taxpayer expense or at the expense of the other people employed by their companies).
I categorically object to the term “rape insurance.”
It is a false categorization of riders which are making people pay for their own abortions.
Morally, I don’t intend to pay for them. You have the right to have an abortion. You also have the right to find a way to pay for it that does not involve me.